Trader’s Notebook

3:30 p.m. New York time

Half an hour before the closing bell. The S&P 500 futures continued to move higher during the session, reaching above 6100.

Elliott Wave Theory says we are here: Wave B with a bigger wave B within a 4th-wave correction — all three waves rising as they continue on their way.

9:35 a.m. New York time

What’s happening now? The S&P 500 E-mini futures continued to rise overnight, from the 6030s to the 6070s.

What does it mean? Elliott Wave Theory analysis sees the rise as the second of three subwaves within the 4th-wave upward correction that began on January 13.

At the moment we’re seeing a correction within a correction, one of a larger degree than the other. To keep things undeerstandable on the chart, I label each wave with its number, followed by a subscript within curly brackets that says how many degrees distant the wave is from Intermediate degree within the fractal structure of the chart..

The present Intermediate degree, rising wave 5{0}, began on December 26, 2018. The upward correction that began on January 13 is wave 4{-16}. The rise is the correction’s first subwave, wave A{-17}, which ended on January 24 at 6162.25.

At that point, the price reversed as the middle subwave, wave B{-17}, began. Like the larger correction of which it is a part, wave B{-17} will also have three subwaves. The decline that ended on January 27 at 5948 is wave A{-18} — the first of the three subwaves — and the rise that began from that pont is wave B{-18}, which is still underway.

[S&P 500 E-mini futures at 3:30 p.m., 70-minute bars, with volume]

What are the alternatives? What I’ve labeled as wave A{-18} may in fact turn out to be a subwave of that wave, one degree lower.. If I squint real hard, wave A{-18} appears to have five subwaves, making it the Zig-zag type of correction. But the rising corrective wavesw ithin it are extremely small, so they don’t really match the size of the parent wave. So for now I’m sticking with the chart as labeled. Time will tell if that was the correct choice.

What does Elliott wave theory say? Here are the waves that underly the analyses, updated with the today’s reanalysis.

Principal Analysis:

  • Rising wave 5{0} is underway. It is a wave of Intermediate degree that began in December 2018.
  • It is in its final subwave, wave 5{-1}.
  • Within wave 5{-1}, rising waves 5{-2}, 5{-3} and 5{-4} are underway, as is wave 5{-5}.
  • Wave 5{-5} is in its initial subwave, wave 1{-6}, which in turn is in its middle subwave, wave 3{-7}.
  • Wave 4{-7} is in its initial; subwave, which is uptrending wave A{-8}, if wave 4{-7} is a Flat structure, with three subwaves, or wave 1{-8} if it is a Zigzag structure, with five subwaves. (I’ll assume Flat as the list continues, since that’s more common within 4th waves)
  • Wave A{-8} is in its initial subwave, wave 1{-9}, as are waves 1{-10}, 1{-11}, 1{-12}, and 1{-13}.
  • Wave 1{-14}, an upward correction and is in its first subwave, wave 3{-15}.
  • Wave 3{-15] is in its second subwave, rising wave 4{-16}, an upward correction
  • Wave 4{-16} is in its middle subwave, descendng wave B{-17}, which is in its middle subwave, rising wave B{-18}

Long-term Waves.

These are the waves currently in progress under my principal analysis. Each line on the list shows the wave number, with the subscript in curly brackets, the traditional degree name, the starting date, the starting price of the S&P 500 E-mini futures, and the direction of the wave. (Updated with today’s reanalysis.)

  • S&P 500 Index:
  • 5{+3} Supercycle, 7/8/1932, 4.40 (up)
  • 5{+2} Cycle, 12/9/1974, 60.96 (up)
  • 5{+1} Primary, 3/6/2009, 666.79 (up)
  • 5{0} Intermediate, 12/26/2018, 2346.58 (up)
  • S&P 500 Futures
  • 5{-1} Minor, 10/27/2023, 4127.25 (up)
  • 3{-2} Minute, 10/27/23, 4127.75 (up)
  • 3{-3} Minuette, 10/27/23, 4127.75 (up)
  • 5{-4} Subminuette, 4/18/2024, 4963.50 (up)
  • 5{-5} Micro, 8/5/2024, 5120 (up)
  • 1{-6} Submicro, 8/5/2024, 5120 (up)
  • 4{-7} Minuscule, 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
  • A{-8} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
  • 1{-9} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
  • 1{-10} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
  • 1{-11} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
  • 1{-12} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
  • 1{-13} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
  • 1{-14} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (down)
  • 3{-15} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (down)
  • 4{-16} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (up)
  • B{-17} (unnamed), 1/24/2025, 6162.25 (down)
  • B{-18} (unnamed), 1/27/2025, 5948 (up)

Reading the chart. Price movements — waves – – in Elliott wave analysis are labeled with numbers within trending waves and letters with corrective waves. The subscripts — numbers in curly brackets — designate the wave’s degree, which, in Elliott wave analysis, means the relative position of a wave within the larger and smaller structures that make up the chart. R.N. Elliott, who in the 1930s developed the form of analysis that bears his name, viewed the chart as a complex structure of smaller waves nested within larger waves, which in turn are nested within still larger waves. In mathematics it’s called a fractal structure, where at every scale the pattern is similar to the others.

Learning and other resources. Elliott wave analysis provides context, not prophecy. As the 20th century semanticist Alfred Korzybski put it in his book Science and Sanity (1933), “The map is not the territory … The only usefulness of a map depends on similarity of structure between the empirical world and the map.” And I would add, in the ever-changing markets, we can judge that similarity of structure only after the fact.

See the menu page Analytical Methods for a rundown on where to go for information on Elliott wave analysis.

By Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, January 28, 2025

Disclaimer

Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.

No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.

License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.