3:30 p.m. New York time
Half an hour before the closing bell. The S&P 500 futures resumed their decline early in the session and reached a daily low of 7560. The price then moved sideways in the 7560s and low 7570s.
Elliott Wave Theory. The price remains much closer to the June 15 all-time high, 7648.75, than to the June 26 low from which the latest rise began. That positioning continues to favor the interpretation that rising wave D{-5} remains underway and is nearing its end.
The interpretation remains unconfirmed, however. The alternative—that wave D{-5} ended on June 15 and falling wave E{-5} began at that point—also remains possible.
Decision Points. A sustained rise above 7648.75 would confirm that wave D{-5} continued beyond June 15.
A fall below today’s low at 7560 would show renewed short-term weakness but would not by itself verify wave E{-5}. A decline below the late-June low in the 7350s would materially strengthen the case that wave E{-5} is underway.
A sustained break below the expanding triangle’s upper boundary, now in the low 7200s, would provide the clearest structural evidence that the decline is wave E{-5}.
9:35 a.m. New York time
What’s happening now? The S&P 500 E-mini futures opened Sunday evening at 7607, a 19-point downward gap from Friday’s closing price. After briefly reaching 7615.25, the price fell into the 7560s and then recovered into the 7590s. The gap and early decline followed further attacks by the United States and Iran against each other.
What does it mean? Elliott Wave Theory begins the new week as it ended the old one: with two possible interpretations of the chart, neither of which has been verified.
The more likely interpretation, in my opinion and reflected in the chart’s labels, is that rising wave D{-5} remains underway. It began on March 30 at 6353.25 and appears to be nearing its end. Under this interpretation, rising wave C{-6} within D{-5} is still in progress.
The less likely interpretation, also in my opinion, is that wave D{-5} ended on June 15 at 7648.75 and that declining wave E{-5} began at that point.
As must often be said when applying Elliott Wave analysis, time will tell.
Both interpretations occur within wave 4{-4}, a downward correction that began on October 29, 2025. It has taken the form of an expanding triangle, a somewhat uncommon corrective pattern in my experience. In this form, each rising wave ends above the preceding rising wave, and each falling wave ends below the preceding falling wave.
Wave D{-5} long ago moved above the previous rising wave, B{-5}, which peaked at 7043 on January 27. Under the standard expanding-triangle interpretation, wave E{-5} would be expected to fall below the endpoint of wave C{-5}, which reached 6353.25 on March 30. It could fall significantly farther, although it might instead come up short in a condition known as truncation.
Completion of wave E{-5} would also complete wave 4{-4} and begin uptrending wave 5{-4}. That motive wave should unfold in five subwaves and would be expected eventually to carry the price to new highs. Its third subwave cannot be the shortest of the three rising subwaves and is often the longest.
Decision Points. A sustained rise above the June 15 high, 7648.75, would establish that wave D{-5} continued beyond that date and would support the preferred interpretation.
A fall below the overnight low at 7566.50 would show renewed short-term weakness, but by itself would not verify that wave E{-5} is underway. A decline below the late-June low in the 7350s would materially strengthen the E-wave interpretation.
The clearest structural evidence for wave E{-5} would be a sustained break below the expanding triangle’s upper boundary, presently running through the low 7200s. Until one of those larger boundaries is broken, the ambiguity remains.
The Chart. Today’s chart focuses on wave 4{-4}, a rising wave within a downward correction that began on October 29, 2025 and its subwaves. has contained all that has happened in the market since. The blue lines trace the upper and lower boundaries of the wave 4{-4} expanding triangle.

[S&P 500 E-mini futures 3:30 p.m., 1-day bars with volume]
Waves Now Underway
These are the waves currently in progress under my principal analysis. Each line on the list shows the wave number, with the subscript in curly brackets, the traditional degree name, the starting date, the starting price of the S&P 500 E-mini futures, and the direction of the wave.
- S&P 500 Index:
- 5{+3} Supercycle, 7/8/1932, 4.40 (up)
- 5{+2} Cycle, 12/9/1974, 60.96 (up)
- 5{+1} Primary, 3/6/2009, 666.79 (up)
- 5{0} Intermediate, 2/11/2016, 1810.10 (up)
- 3{-1} Minor, 3/23/2020, 2191.36 (up)
- 1{-2} Minute, 7/31/2025, 6468.50 (down)
- S&P 500 E-mini futures
- 5{-3} Minuette 8/1/2025, 6239.50 (up}
- 4{-4} Subminutte 10/29/2025, 6953.75 (down}
- D{-5} Micro, 3/30/2026, 6353.25 (up}
- C{-6} Submicro, 6/11/2026, 7232.25 (up)
Reading the chart. Price movements — waves – – in Elliott Wave Theory analysis are labeled with numbers within trending waves and letters with corrective waves. The subscripts — numbers in curly brackets — designate the wave’s degree, which, in Elliott Wave analysis, means the relative position of a wave within the larger and smaller structures that make up the chart.R.N. Elliott, who in the 1930s developed the form of analysis that bears his name, viewed the chart as a complex structure of smaller waves nested within larger waves, which in turn are nested within still larger waves. In mathematics it’s called a fractal structure, where at every scale the pattern is similar to the others.
Learning and other resources. Elliott Wave analysis provides context, not prophecy. As the 20th century semanticist Alfred Korzybski put it in his book Science and Sanity(1933), “The map is not the territory… The only usefulness of a map depends on similarity of structure between the empirical world and the map.” And I would add, in the ever-changing markets, we can judge that similarity of structure only after the fact.
See the menu pageAnalytical Methodsfor a rundown on where to go for information on Elliott Wave analysis.
By Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, July 13, 2026
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader managing his own accounts. The content reflects my interpretation of market structure, including Elliott Wave Theory and related tools.
Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options, or any other financial instrument, or to pursue any particular strategy. The purpose of this blog is education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful. Trading in stock and options markets involves risk and uncertainty. Each trader must make decisions for his or her own account and accept full responsibility for the outcomes.
Charts and tools are used to support my personal analysis. Any data displayed is illustrative of that analytical process and is not presented as a source of market data for redistribution.
All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader byTimothy K. Boveeis licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License
Based on work atwww.timbovee.com









You must be logged in to post a comment.