3:30 p.m. New York time.
Half an hour before the closing bell. The S&P 500 futures rose from the overnight low of 7504 and, as the session progressed, reached a session high of 7563.50. They then began to decline again.
Elliott Wave Theory. The ambiguity noted this morning remains unresolved. Rising wave D{-5} may have ended at the June 15 peak of 7648.75, with falling wave E{-5} beginning at that point. Alternatively, the decline from the June peak may be merely a corrective subwave within D{-5}’s continuing rise.
Decision Points. A rise above the session high of 7563.50 would resume the near-term advance but would not resolve the larger ambiguity. A decisive break above 7648.75 would confirm that rising wave D{-5} remains underway.
A fall below the overnight low of 7504 would resume the near-term decline. A break below the recent lows in the 7470s would strengthen the case that falling wave E{-5} has begun, while a decisive break below 7357.25 would make that interpretation substantially more likely.
9:35 a.m. New York time
What’s happening now? The S&P 500 E-mini futures fell overnight from an early high of 7547 to a low of 7504, then quickly rebounded into the 7530s.
What does it mean? Elliott Wave Theory continues to offer two unresolved possibilities: Rising wave D{-5} remains underway, or it ended June 15 at 7648.75 and falling wave E{-5} has begun. Neither interpretation has been confirmed. The sideways movement since mid-June may continue until the price breaks decisively from the range.
Whichever wave is underway is a subwave of wave 4{-4}, a downward correction taking the form of an expanding triangle that began October 29, 2025.
Decision Points. A rise above 7547 would erase the overnight decline but would not resolve the larger ambiguity. A decisive break above 7648.75 would confirm that rising wave D{-5} remains underway.
A fall below 7504 would resume the overnight decline, and a break below the recent lows in the 7470s would strengthen the near-term bearish case. A decisive break below 7357.25 would materially favor the conclusion that falling wave E{-5} is underway.
The Chart. Today’s chart focuses on wave D{-5}, the next-to-the last subwave of wave 4{-4}, a downward correction that began on October 29, 2025. The blue lines trace the upper and lower boundaries of the expanding triangle form wave 4{-4} has taken.

[S&P 500 E-mini futures 3:30 p.m., 1-day bars with volume]
Waves Now Underway
These are the waves currently in progress under my principal analysis. Each line on the list shows the wave number, with the subscript in curly brackets, the traditional degree name, the starting date, the starting price of the S&P 500 E-mini futures, and the direction of the wave.
- S&P 500 Index:
- 5{+3} Supercycle, 7/8/1932, 4.40 (up)
- 5{+2} Cycle, 12/9/1974, 60.96 (up)
- 5{+1} Primary, 3/6/2009, 666.79 (up)
- 5{0} Intermediate, 2/11/2016, 1810.10 (up)
- 3{-1} Minor, 3/23/2020, 2191.36 (up)
- 1{-2} Minute, 7/31/2025, 6468.50 (down)
- S&P 500 E-mini futures
- 5{-3} Minuette 8/1/2025, 6239.50 (up}
- 4{-4} Subminutte 10/29/2025, 6953.75 (down}
- D{-5} Micro, 3/30/2026, 6353.25 (up}
- C{-6} Submicro, 6/11/2026, 7232.25 (up)
Reading the chart. Price movements — waves – – in Elliott Wave Theory analysis are labeled with numbers within trending waves and letters with corrective waves. The subscripts — numbers in curly brackets — designate the wave’s degree, which, in Elliott Wave analysis, means the relative position of a wave within the larger and smaller structures that make up the chart.R.N. Elliott, who in the 1930s developed the form of analysis that bears his name, viewed the chart as a complex structure of smaller waves nested within larger waves, which in turn are nested within still larger waves. In mathematics it’s called a fractal structure, where at every scale the pattern is similar to the others.
Learning and other resources. Elliott Wave analysis provides context, not prophecy. As the 20th century semanticist Alfred Korzybski put it in his book Science and Sanity(1933), “The map is not the territory… The only usefulness of a map depends on similarity of structure between the empirical world and the map.” And I would add, in the ever-changing markets, we can judge that similarity of structure only after the fact.
See the menu pageAnalytical Methodsfor a rundown on where to go for information on Elliott Wave analysis.
By Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, July 22, 2026
Disclaimer
Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader managing his own accounts. The content reflects my interpretation of market structure, including Elliott Wave Theory and related tools.
Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options, or any other financial instrument, or to pursue any particular strategy. The purpose of this blog is education and entertainment.
No trader is ever 100 percent successful. Trading in stock and options markets involves risk and uncertainty. Each trader must make decisions for his or her own account and accept full responsibility for the outcomes.
Charts and tools are used to support my personal analysis. Any data displayed is illustrative of that analytical process and is not presented as a source of market data for redistribution.
All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader byTimothy K. Boveeis licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License
Based on work atwww.timbovee.com









You must be logged in to post a comment.