3:30 p.m. New York time

Half an hour before the closing bell. The S&P 500 futures rose during the session, to 6147.75. The rise in Elliott Wave Theory is wave B within a 4th-wave correction. From that point the price fell swiftly to the 6060s.

This morning I discussed the Elliott Wave Theory rules limiting B waves. B waves in a Flat, which this 4th wave is, must retrace at least 90% of wave A. The B wave beat that requirement by 7 points and then headed south.

I’ve updated the chart to show wave B{-18} ending at 6147.75 and labeled the decline as wave C{-18}.

9:35 a.m. New York time

What’s happening now? The S&P 500 E-mini futures rose overnight, from the 6090s to 6130. The high point is 32.25 below the January 24 peak, 6162.25.

What does it mean? Elliott Wave Theory counts the January 24 peak as being the end of the A wave that began on January 13, labeled A{-17} on the chart, and the beginning of the first subwave within wave B{-17}. That first subwave, labeled A{-18}, ended on January 27, and wave B{-18} began from that point.

The subscripts, contained within curly brackets, are the wave’s distance from Intermediate degree n the fractal structure of the chart. The current intermediate degree, wave 5{0}, began in December 2018.

B waves are subject to a rule in Elliott Wave Theory.

If the A wave has five subwaves, then the correction is a Zigzag and never moves beyond the start of the prior A wave, which is 6162.25. If it does, then it’s not a B wave and something else is going on. I.e., time to do a reanalysis.

If the A wave has three subwaves, then the correction is a Flat, and the B-wave must retrace 90% of wave A, which would be 6140.75 in this case.

So which type of correction is this one? The A{18} wave had a lot of energy and is almost a straight line. The internal wave count lacks clarity. However, EWT also has a rule of alternation. If the wave 2 correction is a Zigzag, then the wave 4 correction is a Flat, and vice-versa.

The wave 2{-16} correction, from January 2 to January 6, has three clear subwaves, so based on that, I’m considering wave 4{-16} to be a Flat, meaning that it must reach 6140.75 and can go higher, even beyond the starting point of the preceding A{-18} wave.

[S&P 500 E-mini futures at 3:30 p.m., 75-minute bars, with volume]

What are the alternatives? This is word-for-word from yesterday, and may be with us for a while longer. What I’ve labeled as wave A{-18} may in fact turn out to be a subwave of that wave, one degree lower.. If I squint real hard, wave A{-18} appears to have five subwaves, making it the Zig-zag type of correction. But the rising corrective wavesw ithin it are extremely small, so they don’t really match the size of the parent wave. So for now I’m sticking with the chart as labeled. Time will tell if that was the correct choice.

What does Elliott wave theory say? Here are the waves that underly the analyses, updated with the today’s reanalysis.

Principal Analysis:

• Rising wave 5{0} is underway. It is a wave of Intermediate degree that began in December 2018.
• It is in its final subwave, wave 5{-1}.
• Within wave 5{-1}, rising waves 5{-2}, 5{-3} and 5{-4} are underway, as is wave 5{-5}.
• Wave 5{-5} is in its initial subwave, wave 1{-6}, which in turn is in its middle subwave, wave 3{-7}.
• Wave 4{-7} is in its initial; subwave, which is uptrending wave A{-8}, if wave 4{-7} is a Flat structure, with three subwaves, or wave 1{-8} if it is a Zigzag structure, with five subwaves. (I’ll assume Flat as the list continues, since that’s more common within 4th waves)
• Wave A{-8} is in its initial subwave, wave 1{-9}, as are waves 1{-10}, 1{-11}, 1{-12}, and 1{-13}.
• Wave 1{-14}, an upward correction and is in its first subwave, wave 3{-15}.
• Wave 3{-15] is in its second subwave, rising wave 4{-16}, an upward correction
• Wave 4{-16} is in its middle subwave, descendng wave B{-17}, which is in its middle subwave, rising wave B{-18}

Long-term Waves.

These are the waves currently in progress under my principal analysis. Each line on the list shows the wave number, with the subscript in curly brackets, the traditional degree name, the starting date, the starting price of the S&P 500 E-mini futures, and the direction of the wave. (Updated with today’s reanalysis.)

• S&P 500 Index:
• 5{+3} Supercycle, 7/8/1932, 4.40 (up)
• 5{+2} Cycle, 12/9/1974, 60.96 (up)
• 5{+1} Primary, 3/6/2009, 666.79 (up)
• 5{0} Intermediate, 12/26/2018, 2346.58 (up)
• S&P 500 Futures
• 5{-1} Minor, 10/27/2023, 4127.25 (up)
• 3{-2} Minute, 10/27/23, 4127.75 (up)
• 3{-3} Minuette, 10/27/23, 4127.75 (up)
• 5{-4} Subminuette, 4/18/2024, 4963.50 (up)
• 5{-5} Micro, 8/5/2024, 5120 (up)
• 1{-6} Submicro, 8/5/2024, 5120 (up)
• 4{-7} Minuscule, 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• A{-8} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-9} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-10} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-11} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-12} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-13} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-14} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (down)
• 3{-15} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (down)
• 4{-16} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (up)
• B{-17} (unnamed), 1/24/2025, 6162.25 (down)
• B{-18} (unnamed), 1/27/2025, 5948 (up)

Reading the chart. Price movements — waves – – in Elliott wave analysis are labeled with numbers within trending waves and letters with corrective waves. The subscripts — numbers in curly brackets — designate the wave’s degree, which, in Elliott wave analysis, means the relative position of a wave within the larger and smaller structures that make up the chart. R.N. Elliott, who in the 1930s developed the form of analysis that bears his name, viewed the chart as a complex structure of smaller waves nested within larger waves, which in turn are nested within still larger waves. In mathematics it’s called a fractal structure, where at every scale the pattern is similar to the others.

Learning and other resources. Elliott wave analysis provides context, not prophecy. As the 20th century semanticist Alfred Korzybski put it in his book Science and Sanity (1933), “The map is not the territory … The only usefulness of a map depends on similarity of structure between the empirical world and the map.” And I would add, in the ever-changing markets, we can judge that similarity of structure only after the fact.

See the menu page Analytical Methods for a rundown on where to go for information on Elliott wave analysis.

By Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, January 31, 2025

Disclaimer

Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.

No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.

License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com.