3:30 p.m. New York time

Half an hour before the closing bell. The S&P 500 futures rose during the session, from the 6070s at the opening bell into the 6130s as the closing bell approached.

Elliott Wave Theory: The rise, part of a falling 3rd wave that began on February 7, moved above the end of the preceding 2nd wave. Which is within rules of the Theory. No foul, no harm.

In discussing alternative counts (see the “What are the alternatives” section below), I’ve said that if the 3rd wave moved above the end of the 2nd wave, I’d start getting nervous about the analysis. It did move above that point — 6123.25 — up to 6135.50, so I’m now officially nervous.

I’ll look at the matter again on Friday, maybe even ponder it over the weekend, and make a call on Monday, for sure.

It’s charts like this one that cause me to shake my head gently and mutter to myself, “Isn’t ambiguity fun.”

9:35 a.m. New York time

What’s happening now? The S&P 500 E-mini futures overnight continued to fluctuate between two Fibonacci retracement levels, 50% and 38.2% (on the chart in red).

What does it mean? In Ellioitt Wave Theory analysis, the movement is a 2nd-wave upward correction within a downtrending 3rd-wave that began on February 7.

Above that, we get into corrections: The 3rd wave is a subwave of a larger wave C that began on January 31, the final subwave of a still larger wave B that began on January 24.

It’s all part of a 4th-wave downward correction that began on January 13.

[S&P 500 E-mini futures at 9:35 a.m., 55-minute bars, with volume]

What are the alternatives? Should the 1st-wave endpoint, wave 1{-19}, on February 2 instead be labeled as the parent wave C{-18} endpoint, bringing to an end the B{-17} wave that is one degree higher in the fractal chain of the chart and the beginning of a rising wave C{-17wave. All of this is happening within the wave 4{-16} upward correction that began on January 13. The rising C wave, if it is in fact underway, the final subwave of that correction.

If the price moves above 6123.25, the high of rising wave 2{-19} in the principal analysis, then I would switch to an alternative scenario: Wave B ended on February 2.

What does Elliott wave theory say? Here are the waves that underlie the analyses.

Principal Analysis:

• Rising wave 5{0} is underway. It is a wave of Intermediate degree that began in December 2018.
• It is in its final subwave, wave 5{-1}.
• Within wave 5{-1}, rising waves 5{-2}, 5{-3} and 5{-4} are underway, as is wave 5{-5}.
• Wave 5{-5} is in its initial subwave, wave 1{-6}, which in turn is in its middle subwave, wave 3{-7}.
• Wave 4{-7} is in its initial subwave, which is uptrending wave A{-8}, if wave 4{-7} is a Flat structure, with three subwaves, or wave 1{-8} if it is a Zigzag structure, with five subwaves. (I’ll assume Flat as the list continues, since that’s more common within 4th waves)
• Wave A{-8} is in its initial subwave, wave 1{-9}, as are waves 1{-10}, 1{-11}, 1{-12}, and 1{-13}.
• Wave 1{-14}, an upward correction and is in its first subwave, wave 3{-15}.
• Wave 3{-15} is in its second subwave, rising wave 4{-16}, an upward correction
• Wave 4{-16} is in its middle subwave, descending wave B{-17}, which is in its middle subwave, rising wave B{-18}
• Declining wave C{-19}, the final subwave of wave B{-18}, has begun.

Long-term Waves.

These are the waves currently in progress under my principal analysis. Each line on the list shows the wave number, with the subscript in curly brackets, the traditional degree name, the starting date, the starting price of the S&P 500 E-mini futures, and the direction of the wave. (Updated with today’s reanalysis.)

• S&P 500 Index:
• 5{+3} Supercycle, 7/8/1932, 4.40 (up)
• 5{+2} Cycle, 12/9/1974, 60.96 (up)
• 5{+1} Primary, 3/6/2009, 666.79 (up)
• 5{0} Intermediate, 12/26/2018, 2346.58 (up)
• S&P 500 Futures
• 5{-1} Minor, 10/27/2023, 4127.25 (up)
• 3{-2} Minute, 10/27/23, 4127.75 (up)
• 3{-3} Minuette, 10/27/23, 4127.75 (up)
• 5{-4} Subminuette, 4/18/2024, 4963.50 (up)
• 5{-5} Micro, 8/5/2024, 5120 (up)
• 1{-6} Submicro, 8/5/2024, 5120 (up)
• 4{-7} Minuscule, 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• A{-8} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-9} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-10} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-11} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-12} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-13} (unnamed), 12/16/2024, 6163.75 (down)
• 1{-14} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (down)
• 3{-15} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (down)
• 4{-16} (unnamed), 1/13/2025, 5809.25 (up)
• B{-17} (unnamed), 1/24/2025, 6162.25 (down)
• C{-18} (unnamed), 1/31/2025, 6147.75 (down)
• B{-18} (unnamed), 1/27/2025, 5948 (up)
• C{-19} (unnamed), 2/7/2025, 5935.5 (down)

Reading the chart. Price movements — waves – – in Elliott wave analysis are labeled with numbers within trending waves and letters with corrective waves. The subscripts — numbers in curly brackets — designate the wave’s degree, which, in Elliott wave analysis, means the relative position of a wave within the larger and smaller structures that make up the chart. R.N. Elliott, who in the 1930s developed the form of analysis that bears his name, viewed the chart as a complex structure of smaller waves nested within larger waves, which in turn are nested within still larger waves. In mathematics it’s called a fractal structure, where at every scale the pattern is similar to the others.

Learning and other resources. Elliott wave analysis provides context, not prophecy. As the 20th century semanticist Alfred Korzybski put it in his book Science and Sanity (1933), “The map is not the territory … The only usefulness of a map depends on similarity of structure between the empirical world and the map.” And I would add, in the ever-changing markets, we can judge that similarity of structure only after the fact.

See the menu page Analytical Methods for a rundown on where to go for information on Elliott wave analysis.

By Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, February 13, 2025

Disclaimer

Tim Bovee, Private Trader tracks the analysis and trades of a private trader for his own accounts. Nothing in this blog constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell stocks, options or any other financial instrument. The only purpose of this blog is to provide education and entertainment.

No trader is ever 100 percent successful in his or her trades. Trading in the stock and option markets is risky and uncertain. Each trader must make trading decisions for his or her own account, and take responsibility for the consequences.

License

All content on Tim Bovee, Private Trader by Timothy K. Bovee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at www.timbovee.com