12:35 p.m. New York time
The S&P 500 index has broken above its February 19 high of 3393.52, by 1.54 points, to 3395.06. It quickly pulled back.

In Elliott wave analysis, the 2nd wave of Primary degree has broken above the 1st wave of Primary degree. Under R.N. Elliott’s rules, if a 2nd wave breaks beyond the start of the preceding 1st wave of the same degree, it’s not a 2nd wave.
As of this writing, the S&P 500 E-mini futures have not broken above the February high, and neither has the exchange-traded fund SPY, which tracks the index.
Here are the numbers:
| vehicle | primary 1 start | primary 2 high | breakout |
| index | 3393.52 | 3395.06 | 1.54 |
| futures | 3397.50 | 3390 | -7.50 |
| etf | 339.08 | 339.07 | -0.01 |
Things were simple when R.N. Elliott was formulating his system of analysis. Charts were daily, nothing shorter. There were no index futures or exchange-traded funds. He analyzed the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It was the major index of his time, and there were no index futures or exchange-traded funds.
Last July I described my rule for analyzing an Elliott wave event when there is a disagreement between S&P 500 vehicles, in my post “A Funny Thing Happened“. And under that rule, the event must be unanimous. In this case, the index, futures and the exchanged-traded fund SPY must all three participate in the Elliott wave event. Otherwise, it’s too close to call.
So I’m in wait-and-see mode.
10:30 a.m. New York time
What’s happening now? The S&P 500 E-mini futures quickly ran up to a new high of 3390 at the opening bell today, 7.50 points below the start of the February crash. In the second half hour of trading it declined sharply to just above the 3370 level.
What does it mean? If it’s correct that a major downtrend began in February, and the rise since March has been correction within that downtrend, then there’s very little upside left. The start of the downtrend in February, from 3397.50, sets a ceiling on the correction. If the price bursts through that ceiling, then the February crash, rather than beginning a downtrend, was in fact a correction within an uptrend that began in 1974.

What does Elliott wave theory say? Primary wave 2, the upward correction within a Cycle wave 1 downtrend, is in its final movement — Intermediate wave C. The Minor waves within Intermediate C have completed the five-wave set.
What is the alternative? The caveat that goes with any declaration that a five-wave set is complete goes like this: Unless there’s a new high. In that case, then the Minor waves’ count gets a make-over.
The three Intermediate wave rise from June 15 began at 2923.75, and a drop below that level suggests that Primary wave 3 is indeed underway. Primary wave 2 began on March 22 at 2174, and a drop below that level means that the start of Primary wave 3 is a certainty.
What about my trades? I’m looking for Intermediate wave 3 within Primary wave 3 as my preferred trading point.
What else is interesting? A Rand Corp. post, “What Unemployment Statistics Obscure About Temporary Layoffs“, by Kathryn A. Edwards, digs into the unemployment percentages and concludes that the temporary shutdown has morphed into a full recession. Worth a read.
About the chart. The chart is from my iPhone, since TDAmeritrade’s ThinkOrSwim app for laptops and desktops is, for the second day in a row, not working. See Downdetector to track the problem.









You must be logged in to post a comment.