12:05 p.m. New York time
Elliott wave analysis is based on the premise that stock prices represent the thinking of groups of people, which in turn mirrors the public mood. The pattern of a stock chart represents the stereotypical ways in which that mood fluctuates. The great practitioner of Elliott wave analysis, Robert Prechter, has characterized it as herding behavior.
The Great /r WallStreetBets Short Squeeze on GME, which sent the gaming company stock soaring by orders of magnitude, has reversed. The pattern of the rise fits perfectly into an uptrending Elliott wave pattern. Wave 5, of course, is the end of the rise. The ensuing movement to the downside is either the beginning of a new downtrend, or a correction within a continuing uptrend. An article on what happened may be found here. And here’s a chart showing the analysis. (I have no idea what the degree of the waves are, so I’ve used the wave numbers without a subscript.)

I’m fascinated by normality of the chart. This rise was the equivalent of a street action, group protest against the short-seller of hedge funds. It has been aptly described as a popular rebellion of private traders against the rich and powerful. And yet, this revolutionary act followed the same rules as a rise in AAPL, TSLA or the S&P 500: Three waves in the direction of the trend, with the middle wave — the 3rd wave — not being the shortest of the three, and two counter-trend corrections. It all played out in six days, with the price rising to 11 times the starting price before dropping after financial companies blocked GME stock purchases. And despite the rebellious motives behind the rise and the regulatory stomping on the brakes that end it, the chart followed the rules discovered in the 1930s by R.N. Elliott.
By Tim Bovee, Portland, Oregon, January 28, 2021










You must be logged in to post a comment.